On October 28, Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of our client, Hope Rising Community Church, and recommended granting the Church’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction.
The Church is located in Penn Hills, Pennsylvania, a suburb of Pittsburgh. In August 2014, the Church leased a warehouse building in Penn Hills to use as a house of worship. Soon after the Church leased the warehouse, the property owner submitted an Occupancy Permit application on behalf of the Church to use the warehouse as a house of worship. In September 2014, Penn Hills issued an Occupancy Permit for the warehouse. However, in January 2015, City officials informed the Church it had to stop holding worship services at the warehouse by March 1.
The Penn Hills Zoning Ordinance does not permit churches or religious assemblies as of right in any zoning district, and they are only allowed as a conditional use in the City’s residential districts. The warehouse is in the Light Industrial District, which explicitly permits educational institutions, parks and playgrounds.
On March 9, the Church applied for a variance to allow it to host worship services at the warehouse. On April 22, the Penn Hills Zoning Hearing Board voted unanimously to deny the application. As a result, the Church is prohibited from holding worship services at the warehouse facility. The Church has been forced to hold its services at several alternate locations, which has resulted in a decrease in attendance from 85 members to around 40.
In September, the Church filed suit against Penn Hills, alleging the Zoning Hearing Board decision violates RLUIPA. Soon after, the Church filed a motion for preliminary injunction based on its facial claims brought under RLUIPA’s Equal Terms and Unreasonable Limitations provisions.
In addressing the Church’s motion, the Court determined the Church is likely to succeed on the merits of its facial Equal Terms challenge to the Penn Hills Zoning Ordinance. Citing the Third Circuit decision in Lighthouse Institute for Evangelism, Inc. v. City of Long Branch, the Court noted the relevant standard for an Equal Terms challenge is whether a zoning provision “treats religious assemblies or institutions less well than secular assemblies or institutions that are similarly situated as to the regulatory purpose.” The Court agreed with the Church’s argument that parks, playgrounds and educational institutions qualify as “assemblies” and “institutions” for purposes of a RLUIPA Equal Terms analysis. The Court also found the City failed to show how a religious institution would cause greater harm in the Light Industrial District than parks, playgrounds and educational institutions. As a result, the Court found that the Church will likely succeed on the merits of its facial Equal Terms challenge. The Court also found the Church is suffering irreparable harm because it has been denied its First Amendment right to worship at the warehouse, which has caused a significant decline in its congregation.
The Magistrate Judge’s recommendation now goes to the District Judge for ultimate approval. We will be sure to keep you informed of the District Judge’s decision and any further developments as this litigation proceeds.
Dalton & Tomich, PLC is the national leader in successfully helping churches, other religious institutions and their insurers defend their rights in land use and zoning matters under RLUIPA, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. We have helped clients win cases against municipalities and other local government bodies from coast to coast, with experience serving both as general counsel and special litigation counsel.
In 2015, Hope Rising Community Church experienced extreme opposition, the kind that would force it to close its doors and leave behind the families and youth it was so passionate about reaching. As the lead pastor I felt helpless, inferior and as if I had no […]Read More
Dalton & Tomich’s assistance in our RLUIPA matter has paved the way for our church to continue serving the community and for new churches in the area to thrive in the future. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for your stand for religious […]Read More
The Urban Church will be forever grateful to Dalton & Tomich plc for navigating it through a difficult land use issue. Let them give you honest and caring advice because that’s exactly what they’ll do.Read More
Dalton & Tomich, PLC defended a complicated case at a church we insure. Not only is the firm professional, they understand how church business runs and work well within church leadership.Read More
Dalton & Tomich, PLC helped us immensely in the areas of litigation and negotiation! Their professionalism and understanding of church policy helped our church be victorious in a modern day religious land use battle. RLUIPA Religious Land Use Case: Lighthouse Community Church of GodRead More
Dalton & Tomich, PLC serves as General Counsel for the 144 churches within the Church of God in Michigan. The firm provides the legal expertise we need in dealing with the issues that arise during the course of fulfilling our ministry.Read More
I met Dan Dalton during a dark time for our church. He was recommended as the leading RLUIPA attorney in the nation. He demonstrated wisdom, expertise, a gentle nature, a calming inter-relational skill, genuineness, and a humble demeanor, while at the same time, being sharp, […]Read More
Mr. Dalton’s expertise and experience helped us through a very difficult legal journey, ultimately achieving a favorable outcome. His personal interest in helping our church went “above and beyond” just the call of duty. His understanding of both legal and spiritual matters seems to uniquely […]Read More