In what may be the next battleground with RLUIPA, a state district court in Minnesota ruled that the decision to deny a Conditional Use Permit for a religious cemetery was arbitrary and capricious. As a result, the Court granted the Plaintiff declaratory relief. A copy of the courts decision of Al Maghfirah Cemetery Association v. Castle Rock Township, MN. and Castle Rock Board of Supervisors is available through our office.
By way of background, Agstar Financial Services, an agent hired by the plaintiff mosque, was hired to purchase a parcel of land in Castle Rock, Minnesota for purposes of building a cemetery. Agstar submitted a CUP application to the Township including a narrative detailing the Plaintiff’s proposal to build a funeral home and cemetery on the property. The Plan Commission unanimously approved the application to build the cemetery, without a funeral home, and included eight conditions of approval.
The Township Board then received the application and discussed reasons to deny the CUP including, loss of tax base and perceived discrimination of the property owner not burying non-Muslims on the property. The board then voted to deny the use without making any findings. The Mosque then resubmitted the CUP application without a funeral home on the land. The Board then revised its zoning ordinances to exclude cemeteries as a conditional use on the property then voted to deny the second CUP.
In reaching the conclusion that the decision of the Township Board was arbitrary and capricious, the Court rejected the argument that the loss of tax basis was a rational basis to deny the CUP. The Court noted that the Board did not have, and thus did not look at, the taxable value of the land when it reached its conclusion. Further, even if had looked at the taxable value it would have found that the revenue generated from the property was $1,284 a year. The court concluded it was “dubious” that taxes were the reason for the denial.
The Plaintiff did not raise the question as to whether the denial of the CUP violated RLUIPA. Had it done it so, the Court may have granted favorable relief on damages and attorney fees as Court’s have concluded that RLUIPA applies to cemeteries, The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York, v. The Incorporated Village Of Old Westbury, 2015 WL 5178126 (E.D.N.Y.), and denying land use permits based on the loss of taxable revenue violates RLUIPA, Cottonwood Christian Ctr. v. Cypress Redevelopment Agency, 218 F. Supp. 2d 1203 (CA. Cent. Dist., 2002).
Please contact one of the professionals at Dalton & Tomich PLC to answer your question as to whether your land use claim falls within the parameters of RLUIPA.
Dalton & Tomich, PLC is the national leader in successfully helping churches, other religious institutions and their insurers defend their rights in land use and zoning matters under RLUIPA, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. We have helped clients win cases against municipalities and other local government bodies from coast to coast, with experience serving both as general counsel and special litigation counsel.
In 2015, Hope Rising Community Church experienced extreme opposition, the kind that would force it to close its doors and leave behind the families and youth it was so passionate about reaching. As the lead pastor I felt helpless, inferior and as if I had no […]Read More
Dalton & Tomich’s assistance in our RLUIPA matter has paved the way for our church to continue serving the community and for new churches in the area to thrive in the future. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts for your stand for religious […]Read More
The Urban Church will be forever grateful to Dalton & Tomich plc for navigating it through a difficult land use issue. Let them give you honest and caring advice because that’s exactly what they’ll do.Read More
Dalton & Tomich, PLC defended a complicated case at a church we insure. Not only is the firm professional, they understand how church business runs and work well within church leadership.Read More
Dalton & Tomich, PLC helped us immensely in the areas of litigation and negotiation! Their professionalism and understanding of church policy helped our church be victorious in a modern day religious land use battle. RLUIPA Religious Land Use Case: Lighthouse Community Church of GodRead More
Dalton & Tomich, PLC serves as General Counsel for the 144 churches within the Church of God in Michigan. The firm provides the legal expertise we need in dealing with the issues that arise during the course of fulfilling our ministry.Read More
I met Dan Dalton during a dark time for our church. He was recommended as the leading RLUIPA attorney in the nation. He demonstrated wisdom, expertise, a gentle nature, a calming inter-relational skill, genuineness, and a humble demeanor, while at the same time, being sharp, […]Read More
Mr. Dalton’s expertise and experience helped us through a very difficult legal journey, ultimately achieving a favorable outcome. His personal interest in helping our church went “above and beyond” just the call of duty. His understanding of both legal and spiritual matters seems to uniquely […]Read More